A fresh coat of paint and a redesigned roof at State House Nairobi have sparked a heated debate, with critics accusing the government of altering the historical integrity of the nation’s most iconic residence. While the official explanation cites “routine maintenance,” many Kenyans see it as an unnecessary facelift at a time when the country is grappling with economic hardships.
A Monument, Not a Private Residence
State House, a colonial-era structure that has housed every Kenyan president since independence, is more than just a building—it is a symbol of national history. Many argue that the renovations should adhere to the National Museums and Heritage Act, which protects historic sites from alterations that undermine their authenticity.

“State House is not a personal residence to be redesigned with every change of government. This is a national monument, and its integrity must be preserved,” said historian Dr. Elijah Mutiso.
The European Comparison
Critics point to Europe, where centuries-old buildings remain untouched, drawing millions of tourists annually. From the Buckingham Palace in London to the Élysée Palace in Paris, governments recognize the value of preserving heritage.

“When you go to the UK, the Prime Minister moves into 10 Downing Street without repainting or remodelling. Why can’t we do the same?” questioned political analyst Wanja Mwangi.
Public Backlash and Political Undertones
Many Kenyans on social media have slammed the move, especially in light of pressing issues like the high cost of living, unemployment, and corruption scandals. Some opposition leaders have termed the renovations a misplaced priority, questioning the budgetary allocation for such a project.
“People are sleeping hungry, yet millions are being spent repainting State House. Is this leadership?” asked a vocal MP from the opposition bench.
A Call for Long-Term Thinking
Beyond the politics, the controversy raises an important question: Are we losing our architectural and historical identity to short-term aesthetics?
Experts argue that constant modifications to State House, from its paintwork to structural changes, are erasing Kenya’s architectural history.
“This short-sightedness is a disease. We need to think long-term and preserve what makes us unique,” said conservationist Alex Mwangi.
What Next?
With mounting public pressure, will the government respond by outlining the cost of renovations and explaining the need for these changes? Or will the criticism fade away, like many before it?
One thing is clear: State House is more than just bricks and mortar—it is a symbol of our national identity, and how we treat it reflects how we value our history.